Tasmania’s debates over aquaculture, forestry, and energy are framed in binaries: jobs versus environment, growth versus preservation. These divisions fracture not only politics but also communities and inner life.

Drawing on Rudolf Steiner’s idea of the hardening of the soul and Carl Jung’s call for the Third, this article argues for a new orientation beyond opposites. The Third space is not neutral but generative, where ideas compost into gardens, strategies translate into action, and governance is rooted in transparency and practice.

Through threefold social theory, cultural freedom, political equity, and economic mutuality the piece highlights how projects like food hubs, biodynamic farms, and cooperatives act as acupuncture points in the social body. Supported by eco-feminist perspectives and the symbolic guidance of yarrow, rosemary, and nettle, these initiatives show how imagination can become infrastructure.

This is not a time for mediocrity, so Tasmania has the scale and creativity to pioneer a regenerative future, reweaving narrative, soul, and community into politics, economics, and culture.

In this deeply personal and vision-led essay, Dr. Emily Samuels Ballantyne, writing as Dr. Demeter steps beyond the binaries of left and right to offer a politics rooted in care, community, and the living systems of Earth. Drawing from her years of grassroots work, spiritual practice, and institutional rejection, she shares the story of forging a life-systems politics: one that honours the household (OIKOS), values real contribution over performance, and sees regeneration not reform as the task of our time. This is a politics born in gardens, women’s circles, herbal gatherings, and quiet acts of solidarity. It is fierce, gentle, and grounded in love. A call to compost what no longer serves, and tend to the beautiful, emerging future that already lives in our communities, our bodies, and the soil beneath our feet.

Synopsis:
This article explores why Dr. Emily Samuels Ballantyne (Dr Demeter) writes the Island Almanac as a living design journal, a poetic manifesto, and a tool for transition. Drawing on the wisdom of Rudolf Steiner, Arturo Escobar, and Tyson Yunkaporta, Emily outlines how scenario-based thinking and design-led prototypes can help regenerate our core systems: food, housing, energy, sacred activism, convivial governance, community life, and economics. Writing becomes a spiritual and strategic act rooted in land, rigour, and imagination inviting others to co-create a pluriversal future aligned with life.

Synopsis:
This article offers a grounded response to the Australian Universities Accord Final Report, exploring how its promises of equity, Indigenous leadership, and structural reform might take root in practice. Drawing on decades of work across academic and community systems, it argues that true transformation will require more than policy it calls for place-based investment, relational governance, and a living-systems approach to knowledge.

Influenced by thinkers such as Tyson Yunkaporta, Arturo Escobar, bell hooks, Leanne Simpson, and Vandana Shiva, the piece outlines a framework of sixteen university futures and proposes an emergent vision of regenerative education. Written from the perspective of a designer-activist and farm-based educator, the article closes with a quiet call to begin prototyping a new kind of university one rooted in soil, story, and seasonal rhythm.

By Dr. Emily Samuels Ballantyne

This open letter to Naomi Klein invites a deepening of activism, beyond critique and toward connection, sacredness, and embodied care. Drawing on thinkers like Joanna Macy, Tyson Yunkaporta, Rudolf Steiner, and Levinas, the piece calls for a new wave of peace activism rooted in relational ethics, seasonal rhythm, and cultural healing and renewal. Rather than resisting harder, it urges us to feel more fully, act with integrity, and belong to each other and the Earth.

By Dr. Emily Samuels Ballantyne

This article explores the limitations of contemporary Green politics, highlighting its tendency toward urgency, reaction, and spectacle, which often disconnects it from the ecological wisdom it seeks to uphold. Drawing on Arturo Escobar's concept of the pluriverse, it advocates for design practices rooted in autonomy, emergence, and care, emphasising the importance of Indigenous knowledge systems in shaping sustainable futures.

The discussion delves into the physiological and spiritual significance of breath, referencing Rudolf Steiner's view of imagination as a spiritual organ of perception and the role of the vagus nerve in fostering relational awareness. It critiques the commodification of crisis, as analysed by Naomi Klein, and highlights the necessity of addressing the underlying spiritual wounds that fuel societal polarisation.

By integrating insights from thinkers like Vandana Shiva, Tyson Yunkaporta, David Abram, and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, the article calls for a reimagining of activism and governance one that prioritises soil over slogans, ceremonies over campaigns, and listening to life itself. It culminates in a series of regenerative scenarios that envision systems designed for reciprocity, relationality, and belonging.

By Dr. Emily Samuels Ballantyne

Right now, Tasmania’s future is being shaped by a single, homogenous energy narrative “Battery of the Nation” designed and decided by a small group of stakeholders. This narrow vision risks sidelining the diverse voices, knowledge systems, and community-led solutions that are essential for a truly resilient future. In such a defining moment, we must ask: Who gets to imagine the future? A thriving Tasmania requires many scenarios, not just one. Scenario Two is an invitation to co-create not dictate what regeneration looks like, place by place.